Freedom to Teach, Freedom to Learn: A Year at Mission Hill chapter 6

Chapter 6: Like a Family


Dear Mr. Gates,

Microsoft’s “stack ranking” management practice has been in the news lately, most recently on Valerie Strauss’ blog The Answer Sheet (Microsoft’s lesson on what not to do with teachers, Washington Post, 8/26/13).

Strauss writes that this practice, which Microsoft employees have called “poisonous”, has shaped your education reform belief that teachers, too, should be rated and ranked in a similar fashion.  In New York City, for example, the new teacher evaluation plan called Advance sorts teachers into four different categories: ineffective, developing, effective, and highly effective.  Arguably, if you take into consideration the 20% local measure component, 40% of a teacher’s rating is tied to standardized test scores.

However, as we see in Strauss’ article, which cites both Will Oremus’ story on and Kurt Eichenwald’s 2012 piece in Vanity Fair, Microsoft employees view “stack ranking” as “destructive” and divisive.  Fearful of obtaining a low ranking, which could result in termination, employees, particularly those who are high-ranking, shy away from collaboration.

The opposite occurs at Mission Hill, the school we are showcasing on this website as an alternative model to corporate education reform. Mission Hill is a K-8 public pilot school in the Roxbury neighborhood of Boston, MA (note: since filming, the school has relocated to Jamaica Plain).  As you will see in chapter 6 of the video series, collaboration among teachers, students and parents is a powerful tool used to strengthen instruction and to address the individual needs of each student.  Mission Hill has created a strong sense of community, and members remark that the school “feels like home, it feels like a family.”  One teacher claims that this type of school culture forces him to grow and to challenge himself to become not only a better teacher, but also a better human being.

Your top-down, “stack ranking” practice of evaluating teachers is highly destructive.  Mission Hill is proof that an alternative, which calls for collaboration in a safe learning environment, works.


Teachers’ Letters to Bill Gates

About Highlighting Members' Needs

We are running for the following Renton Education Association positions because we believe in the following planks: Becca Ritchie, Candidate for REA President, Nelsen Middle School, Computer Tech Susan DuFresne, Candidate for Primary Executive Board, Maplewood Heights Elementary, Integrated Kindergarten ✅  Demanding a healthy work-load/life balance. ✅  Bargaining competitive professional compensation. ✅  Challenging the status quo test culture with: Less is more! ✅  Emphasizing our professional expertise. ✅  Prioritizing equity and access for all. ✅  Utilizing 2-way 21st century communication tools. ✅  Acting in solidarity with all unions. ✅  Supporting ALL members. ✅   Implementing developmentally appropriate K-3 curriculum/assessment.
This entry was posted in Bill Gates, Collaboration, Common Core High Stakes Testing, Diane Ravitch, Anthony Cody, Valerie Strauss, Washington Post, Freedom to Learn: A Year At Mission Hill, Freedom to Teach, High Stakes Testing, Junk Science of High Stakes Standardized Testing, Measuring Effective Teaching, Microsoft, Mission Hill school, Stack Ranking, Teacher Evaluations, Testing. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Freedom to Teach, Freedom to Learn: A Year at Mission Hill chapter 6

  1. Pingback: Testifying at John King’s Common Core Forum in Brooklyn 12/10/13 | Critical Classrooms, Critical Kids

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s